Wednesday 11 February 2015

POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY



INTRODUCTION

Although there are many agents of political socialization, including but are not limited  to Family, Media, Peers, Education, Religion,  Race, Gender, Age and Geography, and in fact every point where man meets man, only a few major ones shall be discussed  in this unit. The unit categorizes them into two: primary and secondary. The two categories shall be fully discussed.  Knowledge of this unit shall assist the student in:  Identifying the various agents of socialization, Distinguishing between the primary and the secondary ones and Understanding how they work to socialize people into politics . The main content here discusses the major agents of political socialization. These agents refer to institutions and structures that socialize people into politics; the agents that people are introduced to as they grow up, and that affect their political views throughout the rest of their lives. In a sense we can divide the agents of political socialization into two broad categories: the primary and the secondary.  

CLARIFICATION OF TERMS

Socio-Cultural Context
Socio-cultural context refers to the idea that language, rather than existing in isolation, is closely linked to the culture and society in which it is used. This means when language is learnt, the socio-cultural context in which it is used needs to be taken into consideration as well.
Sociocultural context refers to the intersection of the social and cultural events of a certain time period that inform various phenomena such as art and political dealings. Of course, sociocultural context varies across cultures, nations, time periods and many other factors. A set of beliefs, customs, practices and behavior that exists within a population. International companies often include an examination of the
Political Behavior 
According to Eldersveld and Katz in 1961, political behaviour or behavioral approach to the study of politics “identifies the behaviour of individuals or group of individuals as the primary unit of analysis”.  It “seeks to examine the behaviour, actions and acts of individuals, rather than characteristics of institutions such as legislature, executive and judiciary”.  Traditionally, the study of politics was legalistic, normative and based on institutions, and this certainly made it challenging for the discipline to fully explain and understand the behaviour of people within their political environments. It was the need to overcome this shortcoming and achieve a better understanding of politics that gave birth to the “behavioral revolution”. This was a banner under which sociologists, survey researchers and other empiricists gathered in the 1950s to distinguish themselves from those who studied constitutions, philosophy, or history, and prominent scholars who championed the revolution are Robert Dahl (1961), and David Easton (1961).  The main aim of political behavior is to “explain behaviour with an unbiased, neutral point of view, using methods such as sampling, scaling statistical analysis and interviewing among others. The most practical way to do it is to focus on individuals and groups who are the actors in politics.  
However, subsequent scholarly definitions of political behaviour seem to have expanded beyond the issue of method and approach.  The current state of political behaviour, as some scholars now claim,  is  typically concerned with individual behaviour in the society. One of such scholars is Richard Rose who, in her 2007 work claims that political behaviour   is the study of the behaviour of political factors such as voters, lobbyists, and politicians.  From whichever angle it is defined, what you need to really grasp is that political behaviour studies the behaviour of individuals and groups towards politics and political institutions in their environment, and it attempts to use scientific methods to study them.  

Political activities
Political activities attempts to incite or organize the public to put pressure on elected representatives or public officials to retain, oppose, or change any law, policy, or decision of any level of government in any jurisdiction. 







POLITICAL ACTIVITIES AND BEHAVIOR IN NIGERIA

According to Akindele (1990) corruption in Nigeria include among others: Corruption ascendancy to political leadership through election rigging and genocidal political techniques; son of the soil philosophy; politics of expediency; doctrine of ten per centers, judicial fractionalization of human beings; political self-aggrandizement; political Hitlerism as a mechanism for retention of power; replacement of “we-feeling” by “me-feeling”, contractorcontrolled political machinery, uncurtailed lust for wealth, giving and receiving of kickbacks for government contracts, Police insistence on taking bribes as precondition for performing their duties, Bureaucrats indulgence in the act of falsifying accounts, false declaration of assets, violation of oaths of office, payment of money for government jobs not done or not well executed, penrobbery and looting of the public treasury.
Babalola (1995) argued that corruption in politics occurs at two levels. The first level has to do with the various forms of corruption in politics at the lawmaking level while the second level is at the law-implementation level. At the first level, people try to influence law-making and policy decisions while at the second level, efforts are made by people to pervert the course of justice and influence judgements.
Summarily then, the perpetration of corruption in politics is done in the following ways:

(a)     In voting there is outright buying of votes or even voters’ cards during elections. The electorates are induced or ‘settled’ with some form of gratification usually money.[i]
(b)    Connivance with and the “settlement” of electoral officials in order to manipulate or falsify election figures. A glowing example was the 1983 elections in the second republic when the government in power manipulated election results with the connivance of electoral officials (FEDECO[ii]).
(c)     Outright rigging of elections through other means such as thievery, threats to life, all forms of intimidation and the likes.
(d)    Use of the power of incumbency and the state machinery. There is the ‘Iron Law of African politics’ which states that no government in power ever loses election. Office holders therefore makes use of all the available weapons at their disposal to suppress opposition and win elections at all cost.
(e)     Use of money. Money is now a crucial and the most potent factor in Nigeria politics. The system does not make political aspiration available to everybody; it is available only to the rich and powerful. This is so, with the councillorship or the presidency of country, it is the same. You must be rich, powerful and well connected. No matter how popular you are, how credible or patriotic you are, your honour, reputation, integrity, records and desire to render selfless services, if you do not have money, you are a joker. Elective posts usually go to the highest bidder.

Elections and Electoral Behaviour 

This is the aspect that has so far commanded the highest level of attention from behavioral researchers, perhaps because it is often contained in the constitutions of democratic states, or it is a device instituted by the ruling class for peaceful and conservative transfer of political power, as against revolt and revolutions which are often not in their interest. Election refers to organization of voting and its allied activities such as party registration, candidates’   background checks and campaigning.  According to Nie and Verba in their 1975 work, elections are “one of those legal activities by private citizens which are more or less aimed at directly influencing the selection of government personnel and the actions they take”. Today, as another scholar has observed,  “there are more and more democratic elections all over the world in which candidates must decided not only which candidate they wish to support, but also, and perhaps more fundamentally, whether they wish to support anyone, that is, whether they wish to vote or not”. These are the words of Blais in his 2007 article titled Turnout in  Elections. 
On the other hand, the ways people behave towards election as well as the various factors that affect or determine their behaviors under different circumstances are all issues of electoral behaviour. The systematic and scientific study of elections is known as psephology. 




THE SOCIO AND CULTURAL CONTEXT OF POLITICAL ACTIVITIES AND BEHAVIOR IN NIGERIA
The institutionalization of corruption in Nigeria is not without its telling effects on the emerging political culture and behaviour. Corruption has been on for so long in Nigeria as Akindele (1990, 1995) has aptly demonstrated through a retrospective analysis of politics from independence to date. He stated that no regime can be exonerated from corruption. It has now reached unprecedented levels most especially during the Babangida regime which saw the institutionalization of the ‘statement’ syndrome. The on-going political transition has not in any way been free from corruption too as the government is busy manipulating the transition to facilitate the self-succession bid of the ruling dictator.
Corruption now appears to have become a permanent feature of the Nigerian polity. It had become completely institutionalized, entered into the realm of culture and the value-system; it is now a norm and no longer an aberration. The young ones are born into it, grew up in it, lived with it, and possibly die in it. The aged are not left out as they are resocialised and begins to conform to it. Succeeding generations now see it as part and parcel of the social order and the normative system. Cultural transmission takes place and as such behavioural traits which confirms with corruption begins to emerge

Primary Agents of Political Socialization

The primary agents of political socialization are those that people first come across when they are children and they unavoidably interact with as they grow. Almost all human beings pass through these agents, though not necessarily on their will. The primary agents of political socialization in today’s world include the family, the school, the peer group and the religious gatherings. In the contemporary world these socialization agencies can hardly be avoided, and they affect people’s believes and attitudes towards politics.  In what follows we shall discuss these agents one after the other.

(a) The Family: 

The family is a principal agent of political socialization, or any other form of socialization at all.   In fact, M. Kent Jennings in his 2007 work titled Political Socialization asserts that "from the early scholarly inquiries on through to the present time, the role of the family as a prime agent of socialization has occupied an imports in the literature". This is because the family is a relatively small and enduring institution that makes the processes of learning and imitation easier. Apart from this, the family is the first point of call of the individual, and, to that extent, it determines a lot about individual's behaviour; including the political. Above all, every human being, by no choice of theirs, is presumably born into a family, so, except in few cases, every human being passes through the socialization of the family.  

(b) The School

Formal educational system organized in forms of schools and colleges is a common phenomenon in the modern world. In fact, most advanced countries of the world are beginning to lay claim to zero percent illiteracy level in their society while third world countries are following suit.  The implication of this is that everyone in the society will now have to pass through one form of school or the other. Thus, the school, like the family, is an agent of socialization that is almost impossible to escape. Some societies deliberately teach subjects such as civil education, political history and government to educate their citizens on politics. National anthems and other extra curriculum exercises are basically performed in schools to expose students to certain values about politics. What most people know and believe about politics is therefore, especially in today’s world, a function of school attendance. The school then qualifies as a primary agency of political socialization.  

(c) The Peer Group

Man, by nature, Aristotle has long insisted, is a political animal. What you get from this is that man is a gregarious being that love to live with, and around other men. In the process of this social interaction peer groups are formed. These groups consist of people of same or close age brackets, and members of the groups learn many things socially from one another through emulation and reciprocal determinism. If a person belongs to a peer group that is politically conscious for instance, the tendency of the person to become very active and interested in the politics of his nation is very high due to the kind of socialization received in the course of interacting with his or her peers. Peer group is also a primary agent of political socialization because it is difficult to escape in the process of existing in the society. Even schools where the child is socialized is full of peer group influence, though many peer groups also  exist outside the school. 

(d) Religious Gatherings

                         Apart from the family and the school, organized religious gathering is another very strong agency of political socialization in the modern world. It is almost inescapable today. When people gather in the name of religion, they often inevitably discuss socio political issues that concern them directly or indirectly, politics being, according to David Easton, “authoritative allocation of values in the society”. Values that may be authoritatively allocated to, or omitted from people’s homes, families, streets, work places, states of residence, international relation and so on, often make people relate with politics even in religious gatherings where they are supposed to be worshiping. Today is universities, religious associations sponsor candidates into elective positions in order to gain influence. Citizens of some countries consider the religious affiliation of a political candidate as determinant of his or her capacity to rule, and such beliefs color behaviour even in elections.  The discussions and decision on these political issues are often taken in religious gatherings; hence, religion becomes a strong agent of political socialization. 

Subordinate Agents of Political Socialization

                        Structures and institutions such as the media and political parties are not common to all men; they are optional, so they belong to the secondary political socialization agents. Other ones in this category are gender and age which are though common to all men, yet,  do not command strong organizational political influence that, say, the church
and the school may have. Let us examine these four agents of political socialization in details. 

Race and Ethnicity

As a general rule, for the past half-century African Americans have been the most loyal Democrats than any other identifiable group. Some experts believe that this loyalty is weakening, but recent elections have confirmed the strong tendency for black Americans to vote Democratic. Latinos as a whole have a tendency to vote Democratic, but the relationship is not as strong as it is for blacks. To further complicate matters, the various Latino groups have very different voting patterns. For example, Cuban Americans overall have a strong tendency to vote Republican, and Mexican Americans have an equally strong tendency to vote Democratic. Some studies indicate that Asian Americans tend to vote conservative, but there is still a lack of concrete evidence to prove this.

The Media

    
                      The media is a strong agent of political socialization. The print media produces newspapers and magazines while the electronic media comes in forms of radio and television. In all of these media politics and political issues are discussed in daily basis. In fact, it has been argued by Allan Smith  that the 21st century press media is a political media as majority of the news items are either completely political or are connected to politics.  The most recent one is the social media: the facebook and the twitters that are fast penetrating the whole world.  Issues discussed in all these media create values, attitudes and believes in people, and as such, stand as means of socializing them into politics as well as influencing their political behaviour. 

Political Party 


                       A political party is an organized body of people who participate in political activities with the sole aim of getting political power. Membership of a political party automatically translates to discussion and practice of political activities, with all the pranks, and the intrigues. People who belong to political parties learn a great deal of their political tricks, values, orientations, opinions and believes from them, so, the political party is a very strong agent of political socialization. In specific terms, political parties have orientations and ideological divides. There are left wing parties, right wing parties, mass parties and so on, and the orientation that is dominant in each of these parties are systematically handed down to their members from one generation to another. In Britain you have the conservative (right wing) and the labour (left wing) political parties. In the United States it is between the Republican (right wing) and the Democrat (left wing) parties. Although Nigerian political parties have been unstable and episodic since independence, the current ideological divide still stands between the PDP and the APC.

Gender 

            Until recently when universal adult suffrage has permeated the whole world, gender was a very key issue in political socialization. In the earlier Athenian society in Greece, women were not allowed to participate in politics, and so it was in some other parts of the world. The implication is that men would be differently socialized to form different believes opinions and orientation of politics, compared to women. Now that the dichotomy is changing rapidly, and universal adult suffrage is gaining popularity around the world; women’s socialization in politics is fast taking different dimension. Conversely, in the old
Oyo kingdom where women were known to occupy important political positions such as Iyalode, Iyaloja and Iyalaje, and where they exerted great influence in the politics of their people, there was a difference in gender relationship with politics, and this created egalitarian and democratic values among the people.  You may wish to read Eesuola’s Using Indigenous Political Structures to Facilitate Democratic Ideals in Nigeria: Lessons from Pre Colonial Yoruba Kingdom, published in the University of Lagos, Nigeria, Sociological Review, Volume 9, 2011. 

Age
           Also unlike gender, age was and is still a strong factor in the politics of courtiers. Today, as a result of universal adult suffrage, most constitutions allow citizens of eighteen years to vote and be voted for. In some countries where gerontology is common in political activities, only old people take certain electoral positions in politics. These different practices in different societies often shape opinions and orientations of people towards politics, so, age is equally an agent of political socialization. 
            Let us also quickly add that socialization may involve an individual's formative years, or his mature years, or both. Political socialization through the primary agency is not only latent,  but also tends to occur during the formative years of an individual.  Political socialization through secondary agencies, on the other hand, tends to be manifest and to occur during an individual's relatively mature years.  
Political socialization can produce either systemic or non-systemic change. Systemic change refers to a fundamental or far-reaching change in the distribution or exercise of authority in the political system. Non-systemic change, on the other hand, refers to relatively insignificant or incremental changes in the patterns of political participation and association which do not alter or upset the existing distribution of power and authority in the polity. Indeed, generally speaking, political socialization is essentially a stabilizing process and hardly produces systemic change. The political socialization process becomes destabilizing, or produces systemic change, only under conditions of rapid modernization or general societal crisis.

CONCLUSION  

These are the major issues that are critical and central to political behavior. They include political socialization, political culture and political participation, which, on its own can be regular and irregular, then, political communication as well as elections.   What we have done in the foregoing is identify the main thrusts of political behaviour: political socialization, political culture, political participation, political communication and elections.  Each of these aspects is merely mentioned and briefly discussed. They have several factors that determine them and many dimensions they take. These wider issues will be covered in the subsequent units.                           In summary, take a look at your life today, the foregoing four structures family, school, peer groups-  that is friends and colleagues- as well as your religious gathering are four structures that you constantly interact with almost on weekly basis, and in all of them, it is almost certain that politics is discussed either directly or indirectly. This makes the four of them primary agents of political socialization. In what follows however, we shall discuss four more agents of socialization that are not as central to man as the ones   considered as primary. 


REFERENCES
Alan, B. (1965) Modern' Politics and Government, London, Macmillan Press.
Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1965) The Civic Culture, Boston, Little Brown.
Ball, A.R. (1977) Modern Politics and Government, London, Macmillan.
Bender G.J. (1967) Political Socialization and Political Change, Western Political Quarterly,    390 -   407.
Bowman, L. and Boyton, G.R. (1974) Political Behaviour and Public Opinion:
Comparative Analysis. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Dalton, R.J and Klingemann, H.D. (2007) (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 
De Gracia, A. (1952) Political Behaviour, New York, The Free Press.
Easton D. and Dennis J. (1969), Children and the Political System, New York, McGraw-
Hill.
Eldersveld, J. and Katz, D (1961) The Impact of Local Party Activities Upon Electorates, 
Eric, R. (1969) Modern Politics: An Introduction to Behaviour and Institutions, London, Rout-ledge and Kegan.
Greenstein F. (1965) Children and Politics, New Haven, Yale University Press.
Jennings M. Kent (2007) “Political Socialization”, in, Dalton, R. and Klingemann, H. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior, Oxford, Oxford University Press

Malbraith, L. (1972) Political Participation, Chicago, Rand McNally.
Norman, H. N.  And Sidney, V. (1975) “Political Participation” in Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby (eds.) Handbook of Political Science Vol. 4. Massachusetts, AddisonWesley.
Robert, E. D.  And John, A. H. (1972) Political Sociology, London, John Wiley and Sons. 


[i] Settlement syndrome – a new concept now used to describe all forms of corruption in Nigeria. It is otherwise known as “Egunje”.
[ii] FEDECO – Federal Electoral Commission

No comments:

Post a Comment