Friday, 6 December 2013

FEDERALISM AND DE-CENTRALIZATION A CASE STUDY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


INTRODUCTION
The federated system of decentralized power is a chief characteristic of the American governmental arrangements. This is in keeping with the controlling intent of those who framed and adopted each of its Amendments. The main aim was to preserve maximum "Home Rule" by the States, to keep the greatest feasible quantity of power as close as possible to the source--the people--where they can best watch it alertly so as to check and prevent its abuse or misuse, as well as to prevent its unsound, or unnecessary, expansion, to the peril or perhaps doom of their liberties.
This paper seeks to clearly explain the separation of power of the United States in relation to it being a federal state practicing decentralization of powers.
CLARIFICATION OF TERMS
A federal state is one in which there is a central authority that represents the whole, and acts on behalf of the whole in external affairs and in such internal affairs as are held to be of common interest; and in which there are also provincial or state authorities with powers of legislature and administration within the sphere allotted to them by the constitution. It is, in the words of Hamilton, an association of states that forms a new one; or, as Dicey put it, it is a political contrivance intended to reconcile national unity with the maintenance of the state rights.  The U.S.A, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, and the U.S.S.R are federal states.(Daniel J. Elazar,1987)
Decentralization is the process of redistributing or dispersing functions, powers, people or things away from a central location or authority. While decentralization, especially in the governmental sphere, is widely studied and practiced, there is no common definition or understanding of decentralization. The meaning of decentralization may vary in part because of the different ways it is applied.
Political decentralization aims to give citizens or their elected representatives more power in public decision-making. It is often associated with pluralistic politics and representative government, but it can also support democratization by giving citizens, or their representatives, more influence in the formulation and implementation of policies. Advocates of political decentralization assume that decisions made with greater participation will be better informed and more relevant to diverse interests in society than those made only by national political authorities. The concept implies that the selection of representatives from local electoral jurisdictions allows citizens to know better their political representatives and allows elected officials to know better the needs and desires of their constituents.( Jack P. Greene, 1986)
In the United States, the situation is quite different. Laws of the national government, located in Washington, D.C., apply to any individual who lives within the national boundaries, while laws in each of the 50 states apply to residents of those states alone. Under the U.S. Constitution, Congress does not have the power to abolish a state nor can a state assume a power intended for the national government alone. Under American federalism, in fact, the U. S. Constitution is the source of authority for both national and state governments. This document, in turn, reflects the will of the American people, the ultimate power in a democracy. (Michael Les Benedict, 1996)

THE DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS OF AMERICA FEDERALISM
 The distinctive features of federation are the formal division of governmental powers by a constitution between the constituent units (states, provinces, or cantons) and the larger state which they compose. The units have power to pass laws on the subjects allotted to them and to administer and interpret them; and the Federal Authority has similar power on the subjects allotted to it. Both the units and the federal authority may exercise their limits set by the constitution.
The distinguishing features of federalism, as a set of constitutional power relationships between a country's central government and the governments of its local or regional political subdivisions, place the federation somewhere in between the high level of centralization that characterizes the unitary state and the thorough going decentralization that defines the confederation.( James T. 1969)
 The distinguishing features are;
National Government Gains Strength Because Of Its Role In Promoting Economic Growth; Unlike a confederation, in  America the general government of a federation -- the national, or central, government of the federated sovereign state  has unchallenged constitutional authority to speak, decide, and act for the entire country in its relations and dealings with foreign governments. In this sense, the national government is the sole possessor and exerciser of sovereignty. Only the national government can operate as the government of a completely independent political community with absolute power to chart its course in the arena of international relations. (James Madison, 1987)

A formal division of power between two or more levels of government : In the American  federation, the national constitution  the constitution over the whole country -- divides and distributes the constitutional powers of government between the national government and the constituent political units  the smaller communities comprising the larger community. The national constitution recognizes the existence of two levels of government in the country:the national, or central, government and  the governments of the smaller regional communities.And the national constitution grants substantial authority to each of the two levels of government -- national and regional. Each level of government is given the right to make final decisions on at least some governmental activities and services.
States And National Government Are Each Sovereign: In the American federal system, the national constitution protects the right of each level of government to exist. Legally, neither level of government can destroy the other level. The U.S.A., for example, has been referred to as "an indestructible union of indestructible states." (Peter Onuf, 1983)
National government's powers grow steadily, especially regulatory power :America federal union, the national constitution gives the central government control over matters of general, or common, concern to the country as a whole and permits the constituent political communities to regulate matters of more regional or local concern.
There is a written constitution:  This implies that the constitution where the power of the various levels of government are stated in order to avoid clash of duties, is not easily amendable, this is to say every federal system must have a rigid constitution that cannot be changed easily. In other words, a federal state has necessarily a rigid constitution. Normally, the machinery to amend the constitution is one in which both the federal authority and the units have a definite place.     
Autonomy of each levels of government: In American federal system Neither level of government in a federation receives its powers from other. The constituent communities do not receive their powers from statutes enacted by the national legislature. And the national government does not receive its powers from decisions and actions of the regional legislatures. Both levels of government -- national and regional -- receive their respective sets of powers from a common source, and that common source is the national constitution. Both levels of government in the  federal union operate through their own agents and exercise power directly over individuals. In a given geographic, or territorial, region within the country, two different governments -- one national, and the other regional -- simultaneously govern the same land and people.
In American smaller regional or local political communities comprising the larger, federated sovereign community -- the member "states" or "provinces" of the federal union  are not sovereign states(as they would be in a confederation). That is, the smaller communities are neither completely nor virtually independent. Instead, they are semi autonomous- that is, partially self-governing. They possess autonomy, not sovereignty. However, the degree of autonomy, or self-government, is substantial.( Paul C. Nagle 1964)
SUMMARY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL SYSTEM
            The USA is a federal state, a union of 50 states. The president is the head of the executive in the USA. He is elected for four years. The powers of the president may be discussed under heads, executive, legislative and judicial.
            Congress is the legislature of the United States. It contains two bodies, the Senate and the House of Representatives. The senate is composed of 100 members, two senators from each state, chosen by popular vote for six years. The House of Representatives is composed of 436 members, elected for two years and appointed among the several states according to their population in which each state has equal representation.
             The process of law-making in USA is similar to that of France and Britain. Bills are given three readings in one House, referred to committees, reported, debated, considered by the House and sent to the Executive head for his signature.
            The director of the Bureau of the Budget, an official working under the control of the president, prepares the budget more or less on the English plan with estimates of the appropriations necessary for the different departments of government and a statement of probable revenues. The budget is submitted to the congress on the responsibility of the president. It is considered by two committees of the House of Representative, viz. the committee on ways and means and the committee on appropriations. These committees report to the House, and later the House debates and passes the Finance Bill and the Appropriation Bill. The bills are then sent to the senate, and with any amendments agreed to by the House, to the president. 
            The judicial system of USA is divided into distinct series of courts: state courts and federal courts. The state courts are set up under the state constitutions, and normally concern themselves with cases which involve the adjudication of rights claimed under the state constitutions and the state courts are usually elected by the people for short terms.
            The federal judiciary consists of a supreme court, 11 circuit courts of appeal, 84 district courts, a court claims and a court of customs. The jurisdiction of the federal courts, as defined in the constitution, relates to two types of cases: those which concern certain matters and those which concern certain parties.
            The party system division is between the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans; the former were in favour of making the federal government strong by interpreting the constitution liberally in its favour, the latter were champions of state rights. Constitution liberally in its favor, the latter was champions of state rights. (Daniel J. Elazar, 1984)
DIVISION OF POWER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
            The United State of America  is a federal sate. In every federal state there is division of powers between the centre and the units. In the USA, the constitution:
1.      Enumerates the powers at the centre;
2.      Prohibits the centre from doing certain things;
3.      Prohibits the state from doing certain things
4.      Leaves the residue, i.e. the powers not delegated to the centre or prohibited to the states, to the states or to the people.
A.     Congress is given power to levy and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general  welfare of the united states; to borrow money on the credit of the united states; to declare war; to raise and support armies and to maintain a navy; to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several  states; to establish a uniform rule of naturalization and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcy; to coin money  and regulate the value thereof, and to fix the standards of weights and measures; to establish post office; to legislate for the national capital and the small district in which it is situated, i.e. for the city of Washington and District of Columbia in which it stands; to make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other  property belonging to  the united states; and generally to make all  the laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers.
B.     The powers prohibited to the centre are that it may not suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus ‘unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it’; may not pass a bill of attainder to ex post facto  law; may not impose any tax or duty on articles exported from any state; may give no preference ‘by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one state over those of another’; and may make no law respecting an  establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of people peaceably to assemble and to petition of government for a redress of grievances. The constitutional provisions further prohibit unreasonable searches and general warrants; require serious crime tried on indictment found by a grand jury; forbid any person to be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, to be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, or to be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
C.      The prohibitions on the states are that no state may enter  into any treaty, alliance or confederation; coin money; utter bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin tender in payment  of debts; or pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts. Further, they are forbidden, without the consent of congress, so levy imposts  of duties on imports or exports  except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws, or any duty of tonnage,  to keep troops  or ships of war time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay; to permit slavery; and to deny the franchise on account of race, colour, or previous  condition of servitude, or of sex. Finally, no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property without the process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of law.
D.    Residuary powers. The powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. It may be added, finally that the federal government has certain obligations to the states.
i.                    It must respect their territorial integrity; congress is directed by the constitution to see that no new state is formed  or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state; nor any state…formed by the junction of two or more states or parts of states, without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned.
ii.                   It must protect them against invasion, and, on application from their legislature or from the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened), against domestic violence.
iii.                It must guarantee to very state a republican form of government.
Conclusion
Federalism and the federal system define the basic structure of American government. There were many disagreements at the Constitutional Convention. Many delegates feared a national government that was too strong and many delegates feared that states' rights would merely continue the weak form of government under the Articles. The Constitution created a federal system of government (federalism) as a compromise. Under federalism, power is shared and divided between national and state governments. Each has specific powers unto themselves while they also share certain powers. Both levels have their own agencies and officials and directly affect the people. The Founding Fathers really had no other choice except federalism. The weak union created under the Articles would not work yet people did not want to give all the power to a national government. Federalism was the middle ground--compromise--a way to distribute authority between the states and the national government.

References
Daniel J. Elazar, American Federalism: The View from the States (3rd ed., Harper & Row, 1984)
Daniel J. Elazar, Exploring Federalism (University of Alabama Press, 1987)
James T. Patterson, The New Deal and the States (Princeton University Press, 1969)
James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, The Federalist Papers (Penguin, 1987)
Jack N. Rakove, Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution.(Napoli press, 1994)
Jack P. Greene, Peripheries and Center: Constitutional Development in the Extended Polities of the British Empire and the United States, 1607-1788 (University of Georgia Press, 1986)
Michael Les Benedict, The Blessings of Liberty: A Concise Constitutional History of the United States (D.C. Heath and Company, 1996)
Michael Lienesch, New Order of the Ages: Time, the Constitution, and the Making of Modern American Political Thought (Princeton University Press, 1988)
Paul C. Nagle, One Nation Indivisible: The Union in American Thought (Oxford University Press, 1964)
Peter Onuf, The Origins of the Federal Republic (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983).


1 comment: